Skip to main content

Search

Search

Serialization Of Labels Checked Into Librarian

Comments

3 comments

  • Avatar
    Ian Cummings
    Moderator

    I trust you're using the latest service release for v10.1?

     

    http://www.seagullscientific.com/support/service-releases-legacy-versions/v101/

     

    How are the labels being printed?  In BT directly, through Print Station, or something else?

     

    You might want to contact tech-support directly for assistance.

    0
  • Avatar
    Legacy Poster

    Thanks for the reply Ian. Yes I'm running Bartender 10.1 SR4 and labels are being printed through the Print Station.

    0
  • Avatar
    Legacy Poster

    I've finally gotten around to talking to my local Bartender tech-support. They managed to replicate my observations and basically confirmed that this is a feature that would not be supported in Bartender 10.1.

     

    I've got to say that this is rather disappointing as I had thought that serialization within the local label template would be a very basic feature that would be provided by a professional label management software.

     

     

    Just to sum up the issue that I encountered:

     

    * I deploy the Enterprise Automation version of Bartender 10.1 to a mass production environment in a factory

    * Label templates are checked into the Bartender Librarian and users print labels through the Bartender Print Station

    * Labels are set to serialize with every piece of label printed

    * While serialization works fine within a print job, it appears that at the end of the print job, Bartender is having trouble checking the label back into the Librarian. As such, when a fresh print job is launched, the last used serial number is forgotten and the serial number starts from 1 again.

    * This causes problems for my deployment as it results in duplicate serial numbers, which is a big no-no production of products which eventually gets shipped to consumers

     

     

    My local tech-support team did offer a workaround which is to trigger serialization through a Global Database field. This works fine other than the fact that I run literally hundreds of labels that need to be serialized independently. As such, I would need to create hundreds of Global Database fields to support my application, which is a bother to manage, but I guess my choices are limited at the moment.

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.